The Ballot Result: What It Means And What Comes Next
By
Napo HQ
Napo members have voted to accept the latest probation pay offer. Ian and Ben unpack what the result really means for the union and the campaign ahead?
Rather listen to the podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon or more? Click here
It is reasonable to expect that where there have been delays in pay negotiations, there should be a form of financial compensation applied to the organisation. This could take the form of a penalty or interest payment, paid in addition to the agreed backdated sum.
The current approach of issuing a lump-sum backdated payment does not fully recognise the financial disadvantage experienced. Had the payments been made at the correct time, the money could have been earning interest in a personal bank account. Receiving it retrospectively means there has been a loss of potential financial gain.
Additionally, inflation and rising costs reduce the real value of delayed payments. If the money had been available earlier, its purchasing power would have been greater than it is now.
There are also individual financial impacts to consider. Some employees may have fallen behind on bills due to not receiving their pay increase on time, potentially incurring late payment fees or penalties. In such cases, individuals are not only disadvantaged by delay but may end up paying more than they would have originally, placing them in a materially worse financial position.
For these reasons, it would be fair and proportionate for delayed pay settlements to include an additional financial adjustment to reflect:
lost interest
reduced purchasing power due to inflation
and any financial hardship or penalties incurred as a result of the delay
One Response
It is reasonable to expect that where there have been delays in pay negotiations, there should be a form of financial compensation applied to the organisation. This could take the form of a penalty or interest payment, paid in addition to the agreed backdated sum.
The current approach of issuing a lump-sum backdated payment does not fully recognise the financial disadvantage experienced. Had the payments been made at the correct time, the money could have been earning interest in a personal bank account. Receiving it retrospectively means there has been a loss of potential financial gain.
Additionally, inflation and rising costs reduce the real value of delayed payments. If the money had been available earlier, its purchasing power would have been greater than it is now.
There are also individual financial impacts to consider. Some employees may have fallen behind on bills due to not receiving their pay increase on time, potentially incurring late payment fees or penalties. In such cases, individuals are not only disadvantaged by delay but may end up paying more than they would have originally, placing them in a materially worse financial position.
For these reasons, it would be fair and proportionate for delayed pay settlements to include an additional financial adjustment to reflect:
lost interest
reduced purchasing power due to inflation
and any financial hardship or penalties incurred as a result of the delay